KONTRA-KABLAS NGA DESISYON HAN KORTE SUPREMA HIUNONG HA PARTYLIST, GINSUKNA HAN BAYAN-SB

Kabataan Partylist members in Tacloban stage rally near Comelec 8 Office to protest the continuing harassment vs progressives amid SC ruling favoring entry of rich, powerful PLs
Kabataan Partylist members in Tacloban stage rally near Comelec 8 Office to protest the continuing harassment vs progressives amid SC ruling favoring entry of rich, powerful PLs

Abril 19, 2013
Pahayag ha Midya

Mahitungod han bag-o nga desisyon han Korte Suprema hiunong han kanan Commission on Elections (COMELEC) posisyon kun hin-o an poyde umapi ha Partylist System, nagpahayag hi Jun Berino, Secretary General han Bayan Sinirangan Bisayas (Bayan-SB) han masunod nga punto:

Una, mayda haligot nga purtahan han mga kablas ngan mardyinalisado para direkta makagpartisipar paghimo hin mga palisiya ngan balaud pinaagi han Sistema nga Partylist nga yana mas nagin makuri na mahigamitan han mga kablas.

An pagpakuri ginhimo pamaagi han paghikaw o pagbalewara han probisyon mismo ha Partylist ngan han nauna nga desisyon han Korte Suprema nga 1) an Sistema nga Partylist (nga may pag-alotaga hin 20% nga lingkuran ha Kongreso) in reserbado la ha mga kablas ngan mardyinalisado;

Tungod han posibilidad nga gamiton han mga riko ngan poderoso nga pulitiko an Partylist, nagmalatumat hi Berino han Bayan-SB nga diri ini angay gamiton para mag-shortcut o makamenos ha gastos ka-Congressman an hin-o la nga rikuhanun ngan tradisyunal nga pulitiko nga may kapas man kunta umapi ha regular nga eleksyon para magin tinaglawas han congressional districts.

Dugang pa ni Berino nga ha aton nag-agi nga eksperyensya, an pag-abusar han Sistema nga Partylist aada han pagpalusot han mga diri angay umapi dinhi sugad pananglitan han Partylist han anak ni anay Presidente Gloria Arroyo nga nagin magbaralaud nga ‘nagrepresentar’ kuno han kablas nga mga security guards.

Ha mas harani ha aton, ginkwestyon han Bayan an An Waray Partylist tungod han iya kaangayan magrepresentar ha mga kablas tungod kay an iya mga nominado ha Kongreso mga milyunaryo ngan diri mga kablas, dugangan pa han ira nagin minimal nga paghimo hin mga balaudnon nga pabor ha mga kablas ngan sektor nga angay kunta hini gintataglawasan (http://www.philstar.com/election-2013/2013/04/12/929907/11-party-list-solons-failed-represent-their-sectors-study).

Pero tungod hini nga desisyon han Korte Suprema, poyde na yana dumalagan ha Partylist bisan adton mga bilyunaryo sugad han mga dagko nga agaron maytuna, mga tagsuporta ngan taga-pondo ni Presidente Noynoy Aquino, dagko nga mga negosyante, mga tawuan han mga langyaw nga korporasyon sugad han mga mining corporation.

Bisan an mga tradisyunal nga mga pulitiko poyde liwat dumalagan ha Partylist. Pahayag pa han Bayan-SB nga waray na an gin-ngangaranan nga ‘reserbado’ nga purtahan para ha mga kablas ha Kongreso. An kablas madugang pagka-kablas ngan mardyinalisado ha iristoryahon han pagbabalaud.

Mahitungod hini, an riko ngan poderoso magtitika-riko ngan mas poderoso pamaagi han mga balaud ngan palisiya nga ginhimo han Kongreso kun diin daan na maluya an representasyon han mga kablas nga yana dugang pa ginpaluya tungod han bag-o nga desisyon han Korte Suprema.

Dugang pa nga mga punto han Bayan-SB nga mas madugang an kapas han pag-ligalisa han mga gios nga pabor ha mga riko ngan poderoso; mamenos hin ura-ura an kapas han kablas mag-korehir han palisiya ug balaud nga diri pabor ha kadam-an labi na ha ordinaryo nga mga mulupyo; mamenos an kapas han mga kablas makapaghimo hin balaudnon o palisiya pagtalwas ha ira ha kakablasan sugad han pagsabalaud han Genuine Agrarian Reform Bill (GARB) ngan mas madugang an diri pagkapatas han oportunidad ha pagpakabuhi.

Hini nga sitwasyon nga mas naghaligot pa an ligal nga pulitikal nga purtahan para pagpa-ursa ha kakablasan pinaagi han Sistema nga Partylist ha Kongreso, nagmalatumat an Bayan-SB nga may posibilidad nga mas magigin makaaraghat an iligal nga pulitikal nga purtahan han armado nga pakigbisog han mga kablas ngan mardyinalisado.

Ha luyo han sunud-sunod nga mga desisyon han Korte Suprema nga mas nagin pagpabor ha interes han mga riko ngan poderoso, nagpahayag an Bayan-SB nga magpapadayon ini ha mas kasasarigan nga pagbug-os han pagkaurusa han katawhan pinaagi han pagpukaw, pag-organisa ngan pagpagios ha parlamento ha kakalsadahan.

Panlantaw* Feature | Just the Same Old Wolf: A Brief Anatomy of IPSP Bayanihan

Just the Same Old Wolf: A Brief Anatomy of IPSP Bayanihan

After Oplan Bantay Laya’s (Freedom Watch) frustration to win an ambitious war against state enemies, a new Oplan unfolds to make up for defeats suffered by its militarist and widely criticized predecessor Bantay Laya 1, 2 & Extension. Oplan Bayanihan (OpBay) is simply the counter-insurgency plan dressed anew. It is patterned by the US-Aquino II Regime from the United States’ Counter Insurgency (COIN) Guide of 2009. While it has consistently denied allegations of human rights violations in the previous Oplan, the new Internal Peace & Security Plan (IPSP) Bayanihan said it will not win this counter-insurgency war by “just killing the person” or its perceived ‘enemy’ as it did in the previous plans but by winning him by championing “peace & development.” With new strategies and concepts at hand, a “new paradigm” unfolds.

A new paradigm?

Oplan Bayanihan (IPSP Bayanihan) boasts its “paradigm shift.” It is a deviation from “defeating the enemy” to “winning the peace” and giving equal and same emphasis to combat and non-combat dimensions of military operations.  Even with the concept of winning the peace, OpBay mandates massive and focused military operations. It means identifying a target area where all firepower and military force shall be concentrated. Meanwhile, non-combat dimensions of military operations espouse the tactic of giving emphasis on Civil Military Operations (CMO) and their effective use of the Civilian Relations Service (CRS). The CMO’s activities include giving relief missions, medical missions and other humanitarian mission, while the CRS has for its goal the saturation of military propaganda in the mainstream mass media.

This so-called paradigm shift offer new names with the same old concepts. The “Reengineered Special Operations Team” (RSOT) is now known as the “Peace and Development Teams” (PDT). The PDT focuses on “clearing” the Barangays. By clearing means the military focuses on one barangay which they believe to be an insurgency hotbed or barangay which has an ongoing anti-feudal struggle or active peasant organization and movement. Once they were able to identify the Barangay, they will have their military installation on said barangay and conduct their so-called “Community Organizing for Peace and Development.” Its aim is to allegedly “bring the government closer to the people” by delivering basic social services, constructing schools and roads, all for the purpose of counter insurgency.

The “Peace and Development Teams” is programmed to identify the peasant leaders in the target community. Upon identification, they will use their “hard” and “soft” approach. By soft approach, they do convincing of the identified peasant leader or the community leader to cooperate and to “give information” on the alleged concentration of rebels in the community. If said leader choose not to “cooperate,” the time comes for the “hard” approach. “Hard approach” includes subjected the person to harassment, threat, intimidation, interrogation, physical assault, torture, and worse, killing.

The “Strategic Holistic Approach” (SHA) is dressed anew as the “Whole of Nation Approach” but a new concept like “People-Centered Approach” is introduced. By the “Whole of Nation Approach,” it prescribes concerted efforts of all concerned—the National Government, the Local Government Units, Government Agencies, Non-Governmental Organizations, Civil Society Organizations, and the people as a whole, they being the recipient of “peace and development” efforts of the government. All of these components are all under the command and control of the Armed Forces of the Philippines. “Under the command” would translate that all agencies/government units will all be waiting for the AFP to prescribe them what they will do, when to do it, and how it would be done.

Still militaristic

OpBay allows a clear transgression and affront to the Constitutional mandate that “Civilian authority is supreme over the military.” In a much simpler term, OpBay is an implied Martial Rule. The “People-centered Approach” gives emphasis to the military’s compliance to human rights, international humanitarian law, and the rule of law. This is a concept which is both an admission of guilt and a façade used to fool the people into showing the “good side” of the military but in reality; they still espouse their barbaric and mercenary nature.

This new packaging is based on the 2009 US COIN (Counter-insurgency) Guide and the military document “Civilianizing the Counter-Insurgency War” written by Gen Francisco Cruz, Jr. of the Armed Forces of the Philippines. The military document gives emphasis to two points: the vital role of the government agencies and the vital role of the local chief executives. The clear-cut practice in compliance with this document is the formation of the Regional Peace and Development Councils and the Provincial Peace and Order Councils. Said formations showcases the “cooperation” of all heads of government agencies, local chief executives, the police and the military: “whole of nation approach” at work.

In harmony

The Governor is mandated to act as a Brigade Commander while a Mayor is mandated to act as a Battalion Commander. The local chief executives are called to act out their vital role in winning the counter-insurgency war; this translates to giving a civilian face to the military concepts and military war.

The heart of OpBay is banked on the concept of “perception of relative deprivation” and “exploitable issues.” OpBay sees the economic condition of the Philippines with “unequal economic opportunity” and the presence of a “large gap between the rich and the poor.” However, OpBay do not see this economic situation as the root cause of insurgency in the country. OpBay sees that there is only the so called “perception of relative deprivation” which causes the people to think that he is poor and that he needed to demand from the government or take up arms because the “left” is using the so called “exploitable issues” to “fuel” and “convince” the people to think as such.

In sum for OpBay, economic crisis, poverty, hunger exist only in the minds of the people; hunger, poverty, human rights violations and other issues are only “exploitable issues”. Because of this premise, the government through the AFP, the prime mover of OpBay, will do everything and will use all efforts to change the “perception” of the people towards the government. The Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) is a major counter-insurgency project in relation to changing the perception of the people. The AFP thinks that even without land reform or peasants owning their own lands as long as the government constructs roads to far-flung areas, the farmers would think there is development coming into their households. Everything the local government units and government agencies are doing, through the mandate of the AFP, is only aimed at changing the perception of the people towards the government. In brief terms, OpBay has become a grand psywar scheme.

Lastly, OpBay has espoused in its pronouncements the phrase “peace and development” as its main propaganda battle cry. By peace, they mean opposition is absolutely absent; and by development, they mean constructing roads and giving conditional cash transfers. However, peace and development cannot just exist in the minds and eyes of the people but it must arise from a material condition wherein there is genuine agrarian reform and national industrialization. Genuine peace shall come if it is based on justice while development will only truly exist by addressing the cause of the persistent economic crisis shrouding the whole Philippine Archipelago. (Article by KC, Panlantaw July 2011 Issue)

*Panlantaw is the official publication of Bagong Alyansang Makabayan-Eastern Visayas.

Diwa han EDSA I padayon nga nabubuhi

NEWS RELEASE

February 22, 2010

Makalabay an 24 ka tuig tikang han nahimugso an People Power o kilala liwat komo EDSA I dida han Pebrero 22-25, 1986 nga nakapagpatalsik han diktadurya ni Ferdinand Marcos, buhi la gihapon an diwa han EDSA bisan pa man waray tinuod nga pagbabag-o nga nakita ilarum han upat nga mga presidente katima kan Marcos.

“Duha nga mayor nga leksyon an aton nakuha tikang han People Power han 1986: una, napamatud-an naton nga pinaagi han nagkakaurusa nga kusog ngan paggios han katawhan, kaya naton magdaog ha bisan ano pa man nga pakigbisog, ilabi na an magpatalsik hin presidente; ngan ikaduha, mas napadig-on an aton pagkita nga diri basta-basta masosolbar an krisis ngan kakurian nga nakaugat ha aton nasud pinaagi la han pagliwan hin presidente,” sumala pa kan Bong Signo, Tagapagyakan han Bagong Alyansang Makabayan-Sinirangan Bisayas (BAYAN-SB).

Dugang pa ni Signo tungod nga tiarabot na liwat an eleksyon, diri kita dapat magpadara han mga halanguhang nga mga saad han mga tradisyunal nga pulitiko pareho han mga ginsaad han sumaliwan katima han duha nga madinaugon nga People Power.

“Labaw pa ha eleksyon an aton ginhihingita nga pagbabag-o pareho han tinuod nga reporma ha tuna nga nasudnon nga industriyalisasyon nga diri basta-basta maipapatuman pinaagi la han pagliwan hin president,” pahayag ni Signo.

Nagsiring pa an BAYAN-SB nga pareho han esensya han People Power, angay gamiton han katawhan an iya nagkakaurusa nga kusogpara magpadaog hin mga progresibo nga pwersa nga nakandidato ha nasyunal ngan lokal nga pamunuan nga makakabulig pagduso han tinuod nga pagbabag-o, kadungan han ginduduso han hiluag nga katawhan nga nakikigbisog. ###